Election Fraud, Wisconsin Style

Wisconsin politics ain't so clean any more. One would hope we are better than Chicago or Las Vegas, but all evidence from the Srping of 2000 onward proves otherwise.

This page documents the ongoing fraud in Wisconsin from the November 2004 elction to the present. Since 1/10 ballots cast in Wisconsin are cast in the City of Milwaukee, the center of investigation has been the city. But, fraud in other muncipalities such has Racine, Kenosha, Madison and Neenah has been documented as well

For a complilation of the current list of problems found in the City of Milwaukee (and Wisconsin) to date.

On this list, my focus has been on the illegally conducted canvasses by the local boards of canvassers. This focus is because the statutes are clear on the procedures, filing a false canvass report is a felony, the names and address of election inspectors are matters of public record, and the local canvass provides for the possibility of prosecution. This is because specific acts can be attributed to specifiec people as being committed as a specific time.

I hold out little hope for any prosecutions by either the Dane county or Milwaukee county DA's for frauds discovered in Madison or Milwaukee. "Let 'em Go" Mike McCann is the district attorney of Milwaukee county. Not even election bribery captured on video tape is enough evidence to bring charges. When it comes to vote fraud, since the election of Angel Sanchez, "Let 'em go" Mike has made Milwuakee county a prosecution-free zone.

A fact which was exploited to the fullest on November 2, 2004.
Thanks, Mike


Every known version of the list of systems qualified by NASED issued over the course of the last year.

Here is a link to the 1-page executive summary (Summary as PDF) to my guidelines for creating a deck of test ballots for testing the accuracy of the software of voting machinery. (Full Guidelines as PDF). Please leave any Corrections, suggestions or comments on these 2 documents at CutWaste at WashburnResearch.org

Here is my professional profile.

Why is the software for a Direct recording Electronic (DRE) twice as expensive to test as a Paper Ballot - Optically Scanned (PBOS) system? Here is my report.

Here is a description of how to count 7080 ballots in 4 hours with 15 people for $1000 in pay and $1500 in equipment. Hand counting paper ballots is feasible, cheaper and more secure than any voting system on the market.

My letter to the Wisconsin State elections Board as to why voting machinery with internet or other electronic connections are a BAD idea.

Here are some of my favorite election fraud related links:
Home page of Wisconsin State Elections Board (SEB).
Wisconsin State Statutes.
HAVA Myth busters by VotersUnite!
Wisconsin Regulations, ElBd7, regarding the approval and certification of voting equiptment.
Status and news on voting equiptment by the Wisconsin SEB.
The Hurtsi report from Black Box Voting on 3 distinct programming frauds possible on optical scanning tabulators.


My Allies on this topic (alphabetical order):
Black Box Voting with Bev Harris
Black Box Voting without Bev Harris
Count Paper Ballots
Count the Vote
VotersUnite!
Where's the Paper?


Home